Good IP Governance. A New Directors’​ Mindset.

Let’s start with a simple proposition:

IP + Good Governance = Increased Enterprise Value

The competitive advantage of nearly any Australian business can be tied to its intellectual assets – be it their brands, goodwill, trade secrets, corporate knowledge, patented processes, software applications, product designs etc.

Boards must take responsibility for incorporating IP management issues into their broader governance systems to ensure all key intellectual property assets are captured, protected and managed for the benefit of shareholders.

While companies may have traditionally focussed on leveraging tangible assets and achieving a return on financial capital, today’s innovation economy requires a different directors’ mindset, to leverage intellectual capital for sustainable profits.

Diligently care for your IP: after all, it’s your duty

Failing to manage IP assets and risks in accordance with principles of Good IP Governance* is likely to amount to a breach of a director’s duty to discharge their duties with the requisite degree of care and diligence required by section 180 of the Corporations Act. Company officers can also be personally liable for IP infringement if they are held to have directed the company to commit the particular infringing acts.

Just as directors cannot abdicate responsibility for financial matters, individual directors must inform themselves of matters relating to IP to ensure they can make an informed contribution to matters of risk and strategy.

Good IP Governance in practice

These common commercial scenarios will help contextualise the importance of Boards proactively managing their intellectual property assets. Risks and benefits of Good IP Governance will be readily identifiable from these scenarios.

IP Due Diligence and M&A activities

  • Strong IP awareness at Board level enables directors to properly consider IP risks and opportunities associated with any prospective merger, acquisition or sale.
  • IP savvy boards are empowered to ask the right questions and ascertain the level of IP sophistication of a prospective target rather than limiting their investigations to public registers.
  • The strength or otherwise of a target’s IP position can helpfully guide negotiations on value and warranties.
  • A strong portfolio of properly managed IP assets will inevitably lead to a greater enterprise value than would be the case if the company failed to protect its IP assets.
  • Boards possessing a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of their IP rights can strategically limit their disclosure of relevant assets to guard against the risks inherent in a prospective purchaser’s due diligence.

Investor & Market Disclosure 

  • Boards of private and public companies need to be mindful of IP assets when assessing obligations of disclosure.
  • Overstating the value or status of a company’s IP assets or understating potential IP risks can, for example, have adverse consequences when seeking private investment, satisfying the general disclosure test for a prospectus’ content or otherwise managing a public company’s continuous disclosure obligations.

Aligning IP with commercial strategy

Whether it be the development of a new product, entry into a new market segment, exploring new commercialisation avenues or pursuing territorial expansion, IP issues, both positive and negative, intersect with each of these strategic scenarios.

  • ‘Positive’ from the perspective of identifying and creating new IP rights and associated barriers to protect the company’s strategic investment.
  • ‘Negative’ from the perspective of ensuring third party IP infringement risks are identified and appropriately mitigated.

Leveraging IP assets for commercial gain

  • In furtherance of their duties directors need to demonstrate appropriate efforts to achieve the successful commercialisation of the company’s IP assets.
  • Boards should always be considering commercialisation opportunities whether in the form of direct sales, third party licensing, joint-ventures, strategic alliances, the divestment of relevant IP assets or even the enforcement of their IP rights against infringers as a means to recover damages or an account of profits.

IP as a shield

  • IP rights are legally recognised exclusive rights enabling their owners to create legal barriers to competition.
  • A Board that fails to properly manage (e.g. protect and enforce) their company’s IP assets is jeopardising the company’s investment into its competitive advantage. This may in-turn adversely affect company value and shareholder returns.

IP as a sword 

  • A failure to proactively monitor and enforce IP rights can diminish a company’s competitive advantage and even jeopardise the very existence of its IP rights.
  • A common scenario that Boards must guard against involves the situation where former employees, armed with a company’s know-how and trade secrets, emerge as effective competitors.

Setting the tone for Good IP Governance

Given its direct linkages to commercial strategy, corporate value and operational risk, the responsibility for Good IP Governance ultimately resides with the Board.

So, where to start?

I’ve prepared a generic template strategy to guide directors and business owners to better leverage their IP Assets for growth. The template strategy includes a range of practical measures designed to empower Boards to set the ‘right tone’ for IP management and to add great value to the companies they serve.

Look out for my next post where I’ll share with you, details of my template strategy for Good IP Governance. Alternatively, if patience isn’t your strong point, contact me via LinkedIn or email at to request an advance copy of my strategy for Good IP Governance.

Thanks for reading!

Good IP Governance refers to a framework for the effective management of a company’s intellectual assets to help ensure directors’ compliance with their legal and statutory duties. ‘Management’ being a reference to a company’s policies and processes for capturing, protecting, commercialising and enforcing its intellectual assets and, ensuring risks associated with the infringement of third party IP rights are safely navigated.